Category: BLOG#1

Comment on BLOG#1

Blog1:Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism by Xuchang, https://xuchang335.opened.ca/author/xuchang/

I agree with Xuchang’s idea that behaviourism ignores intrinsic motivation and individual variations in learning preferences and styles. Although behaviourist strategies can be useful for quickly acquiring a particular skill or body of knowledge, they could not promote a deep understanding or long-term drive. For personalised and fulfilling learning experiences, it can be essential to acknowledge and address individual differences.

It could be useful to look into ways to incorporate components of constructivism and cognitive theories into instructional design in addition to behaviourism in light of the disadvantages Xuchang noted, such as the potential ignoring of intrinsic motivation, individual variations, and autonomy. Combining these theories can result in a more comprehensive strategy that takes into account both short- and long-term depth of understanding.

You can design learning experiences that let students actively interact with the subject matter, apply their knowledge to use in real-world situations, and collaborate with peers by embracing constructivist concepts. Additionally, including cognitive techniques like metacognition can aid students in creating efficient study habits, self-control techniques, and problem-solving skills.

It’s important to create a balance between evaluating performance and taking other forms of learning, such as conceptual understanding, critical thinking, and creativity, when it comes to your emphasis on competency and the practical application of knowledge. A thorough assessment strategy that includes a variety of metrics, such as hands-on activities, can give a more accurate picture of students’ learning results.

Additionally, it’s important to address the subject of learning challenges or setbacks with sympathy and encouragement. While external elements like effort and motivation can undoubtedly affect results, targeting the primary causes of difficulties and offering the right support and guidance can help overcome barriers and encourage fruitful learning experiences.

EDCI335 BLOG#1

Scenario: A high school social study teacher is planning a class on climate change. The learning would be designed differently by a behaviorist, a cognitivist, and a constructivist.

Behaviourist method:

Behaviorism - Simply Psychology

Behaviourists would establish explicit goals and expectations for the class, focusing on the particular behaviours that need to be learned. The very common way of teaching may include lectures or seminar to present the climate change to the class. To encourage active listening and writing notes, feedback will be provided by instructors, also some rewards. Then, behaviourists make learners to memorize and exercise the desired learning concepts over and over to make sure that the concepts are in learners’ brain deeply. Finally, tests and quizzes that gauge the acquisition of specific knowledge and facts are used to evaluate learning.

Cognitivist Approach:

Cognitive Learning Theory: Applications in the Workplace

Cognitivists encourage critical thinking and analysis by involving students in climate change-related problem-solving activities. They use interactive resources to engage students in learning by presenting knowledge through powerpoint or other approaches. They will also encourage participation in the conversation, debate, and small-group activities. They help students become more conscious of their own learning processes, such as self-regulation and self-assessment. Finally, students’ grasp of climate change would be demonstrated in projects, essays, or presentations.

Constructivist Approach:

Constructivism – Instructional Coaches Corner

Constructivists conduct group discussions in which students examine issues related to climate change, exchange viewpoints, and create meaning. They give learners meaningful, real-world assignments or case studies that relate climate change. They also encourage learners to learn by asking questions, doing research, and coming up with answers. Practical activities like as field visits or experiments are included to encourage close engagement with climate-related events.

© 2024 yicheng

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑